AI-powered bioprocess optimization

Every experiment moves you forward.

BioOptima AI tells your team exactly what to run next — then learns from every result to converge on scalable process conditions in weeks, not months. Even without prior data.

yield gain
80%fewer experiments
4 weeksto convergence
0new equipment needed.
app.thebioforge.com
Demo preview
BF
BioForge
Workspace
Campaigns
Active cycles
Analytics
Cycles
Cycle 2
Cycle 1
Dashboard
Campaigns
Active bioprocess optimization programs
+ New campaign
Total
8
campaigns
Active
7
running
Planning
1
ready
Concluded
0
complete
CampaignStatusOrganismCyclesUpdated
CHO_mAb_1RunningCHO217d ago
Pichia_MAb_Media_OptRunningPichia110d ago
CHO_MS_0002RunningCHO116d ago
Untitled – 2026-04-08PlanningCHO3d ago
Active cycle
CHO_mAb_1 · Cycle 2
AI-designed · ready to run
Conditions
36
AI-selected
Factors
24
optimizing
Cycle
2 of 3
projected
Est. gain
~5×
predicted
Cycle progress
D
Design
AI-designed · 36 conditions locked
B
Build
Experimental plan ready
E
Execute
In progress · your lab
T
Test
Awaiting results
L
Learn
AI will refine
Results — cycle 1
Converging on optimal conditions
3 adaptive cycles · CHO fed-batch
Yield across adaptive rounds
Base
R1
1.8×
R2
2.6×
R3
3.1×
~5×
Program outcomes
Yield improvement
Time to convergence4 wks
Fewer experiments80%
Scale-upHeld. No re-opt.
AI recommendations
Next cycle designed by BioOptima
Based on cycle 1 · 48 conditions analyzed
What the AI found
Primary driver
0.92
Secondary driver
0.76
DO interaction
0.61
Flagged interaction
0.52
Minor factor
0.33
Cycle 2 — next actions
Narrow design space around top performer
Adjust secondary parameter range
Explore flagged interaction in targeted screen
! Cross-parameter interaction — investigate
Predicted outcome: ~5× yield · 2 cycles remaining
Scroll

Start with the data you have. Or start with none.

Your team runs experiments in your lab, using your equipment. BioOptima learns from the results and recommends what to test next.

No historical dataset required

BioOptima can begin without years of prior experimental data.

Experiments run in your lab

Your scientists stay in control of the experimental workflow.

Your data remains yours

Customer data and results remain customer-owned.

How it works

A closed loop that gets smarter every cycle.

Each experiment compounds — making the next one faster, cheaper, and more accurate. Even if you start with zero data.

Ingest

Prior data, heuristics, or none at all

Design

AI designs the next highest-value experimental cycle

Run

Log results in your existing lab, no integration

Learn

Model updates and the design space narrows

What BioOptima helps you decide

What biology should we use?

Cell Factory Intelligence

  • Strain or cell selection
  • Media composition
  • Expression conditions
  • Biological design space

How should we run it?

Process Intelligence

  • Process conditions
  • Feeding strategies
  • Induction parameters
  • Process parameter optimisation

How do we make it scale?

Scale Intelligence

  • Scale translation
  • Oxygen-aware design
  • Engineering constraints
  • Scale-up recommendations

A different way to navigate biological development

How experiments are selected

Traditional DOE

Fixed matrix, set upfront.

Simulation-first

Generated from a calibrated model.

BioOptima AI

Selected each cycle based on prior learning.

Adapts as results come in

Traditional DOE

No — set before the first run.

Simulation-first

Requires recalibration per dataset.

BioOptima AI

Yes — each result informs the next.

Dependence on prior data

Traditional DOE

Needs an expert-designed matrix.

Simulation-first

Needs a prior dataset.

BioOptima AI

Works with zero prior data.

How results are incorporated

Traditional DOE

Analysed together, at the end.

Simulation-first

Feeds back into the simulation.

BioOptima AI

Incorporated after every run.

How the next experiment is chosen

Traditional DOE

Pulled from the fixed matrix.

Simulation-first

Proposed from simulation output.

BioOptima AI

Chosen to maximize learning.

Proof point

Real results. Real programs.

Microbial fermentation · Fed-batch
productivity improvement

Problem: 8–12 months of static DOE screening couldn't stabilize fed-batch conditions under oxygen variability.

Result: Converged in 3 adaptive cycles — 6× productivity gain and a transferable operating window defined for scale-up.

Read full case study →
Multi-program · Transfer learning
productivity & quality improvement

Problem: Every new strain triggered a full design-space re-exploration, with no knowledge carried forward between programs.

Result: Learned interaction patterns applied across constructs — 3× productivity and quality improvement with reduced exploratory burden on every follow-on program.

Read full case study →

The people behind Bioforge.

Bioprocess science, applied AI, and production software — built by people who’ve worked at scale.

Keerthi Prasad Venkataramanan, PhD

CEO

15+ years taking biology from experiment to manufacturing scale.

PhD Biotechnology · UAH/Absci · DSM · Novozymes

Dharini Govindarajan

COO

Builds the intelligence that turns experiments into decisions.

MBA Duke Fuqua · MS Computer Science (AI/ML)/Amazon · Nike · Capital One

Kebin Maharjan

CTO

Builds the production software that keeps the learning loop running.

MS Software Engineering · Portland State/StageAgent · WebMD

Jo Raju

Strategic Partnerships

Builds the relationships that turn technology into partnerships and opportunities.

Strategic Partnerships · Ecosystem Development/MS · Human Resource Development

Pilot collaboration framework

Start with a 4-week demonstration.

AI-guided experimental design across 2–3 adaptive cycles — no new equipment, no IT project, no commitment beyond the pilot.

Book a Demo